Welcome Guest! please  Login

ISSN 2457-9459 (Online)
ISSN-L 0576-9787 (Print)


2023

Journal Citation Reports
Impact factor 2023: 1.3
5-Year Impact Factor: 1.2
Article Influence® Score: 0.140
Ranked 9 out of 23
MATERIALS SCIENCE, PAPER & WOOD (Q2)

Scopus
CiteScore 2023: 2.3
SNIP: 0.405

SCImago
SJR: 0.264
H-Index: 42
Ranked Q3

 

Title
Optimization of rhamnogalacturonan extraction from linseed using RSM and designing a pH-responsive tablet formulation for sustained release of ciprofloxacin antibiotics
Authors
MUHAMMAD AJAZ HUSSAIN, NAJMA RAEES, ARSHAD ALI, MUHAMMAD TAYYAB, GULZAR MUHAMMAD, MALIHA UROOS and MADEEHA BATOOL

Received February 15, 2025
Published Volume 59 Issue 5-6 May-June
Keywords linseed mucilage, response surface methodology, polysaccharides, on-off switching, sustained drug release

Abstract
Herein, we reported the optimization of the isolation parameters to obtain the maximum yield of the linseed mucilage (LSM) through a statistical technique, i.e., response surface methodology by applying Box-Behnken Design (RSM BBD). The aqueous isolation yield of LSM was optimized by studying the influence of temperature (T, °C), pH, seed to-water contact time (t, h), and seed-to-water ratio (r, w/v). The maximum yield of LSM, i.e., 12.89%, was found at T of 71.9 °C, pH of 7.09, t of 6.24 h, and r of 1:24.50 w/v, according to RSM-BBD. The pH-responsive swelling of the LSM-based tablet formulation (M3), in buffers of pH 1.2, 6.8, and 7.4, and the swelling-deswelling (on-off switching) profile of M3 in the buffers of pH 7.4 and 1.2, respectively, were investigated. The results revealed that formulation M3 swelled at pH 6.8 and 7.4, but expressed minor swelling at pH 1.2. Moreover, formulation M3 showed swelling deswelling behavior at pH 7.4 and 1.2, respectively. The LSM sustained the release of ciprofloxacin for 24 h and followed the first-order release kinetics as well as a non-Fickian diffusion mechanism. Concluding, the LSM can be considered as a pH-responsive sustained drug release material.


Link https://doi.org/10.35812/CelluloseChemTechnol.2025.59.48

- Full text available Download



Reviewer Information

Editor Information